(The absence of the national project and the crisis crisis, political development and revolution (12-6 Abdul Ghaffar Mohammed Saeed
(The absence of the national project and the crisis crisis, political development and revolution (12-6
Abdul Ghaffar Mohammed Saeed
?Between the upheaval and the revolution Is it confusing or confusing concepts
About the term revolution
A large number of Sudanese political writers and analysts, the October uprising, especially the Democrats and the leftists of the October generation, know those who contributed to its creation or experience its events. (Note this confusion and confusion again in the definition of the September 2013 uprising. In spite of the keenness of the Democrats and the Sudanese leftists to control the terminology and commitment to their meanings compared to other powers, but they deal with unrealistic strange, with the issue of October where they miss the term revolution is the The cognitive and analytical knowledge of the concept of revolution, concepts are in the field of thought, and Marxism, for example, a clear conception of the concept of revolution, how if this confusion?
Revolution as a scientific term is a process that leads to a quantum leap in improving human life. The invention of the atomic bomb is not a revolution, but the discovery of penicillin and antibiotics was a revolution in medicine. If we apply this to sociology, any action that improves the life of the society in general and radical and makes it more harmonious and developed and raise the level of public health, welfare and happiness for all members of society is a revolution.
This leads us to ask another question now: What is the work that leads to improving the life of society in general and make it more harmonious and developed and raise the level of health and welfare and happiness for all members of society?
On the basis of that, in order to have a revolution we have to start from the end. Any of the things that we want to reach and have a vision about the shape of our lives after the revolution and the way of organization and management of society in order to achieve these goals that we put into our eyes.
Scientists who discovered penicillin and invented the plow or steam machine had clear goals for which they worked and therefore achieved revolutionary successes. And the engineer who wants to build a house sets a plan in advance and has a clear perception of the results and any imbalance in the calculations leads to the collapse of the building. The same goes for revolution. Since the revolution began since the discovery of the first property of penicillin, first plow and first steam engine, the social revolution does not start in the street, but it starts from the moment you have a complete idea of how to establish a better society. And your daily work to bring this and make it a reality and all the means used to make this transformation are different chapters of the revolution. Awareness-raising and knowledge about the future is a revolution in consciousness. The formation of the uprising committees in the neighborhoods is an important step in the direction of the revolution and going out into the fields in small or large groups to push for change through peaceful sit-ins. The civil struggle is also an important step towards the revolution.
The social revolution is all that is done in the course of change from the first day until the last day (accumulation). It is a comprehensive social process of change at all levels, the most important of which is preparing the masses for the establishment of these social transformations. It is absolutely nothing to do with the promotion of anger and retribution through angry crowds who know the names of their enemies and everything about the manufacture of cocktails and do not know anything about agriculture and industry and how to establish and manage a prosperous human society free from tyranny and injustice. The forces of the fait accompli are in fact the forces that call for blind revolutions and push societies to the streets at all costs to ignite the spiral of violence. These forces can only destroy what is at best and bring societies into chaos.
The real revolution is the social revolution that rejects the reality of the poor and presents a comprehensive and comprehensive vision of the prosperous future and works to achieve it (according to a national project agreed by the forces of change, dealing with the problems and plans and solutions to outstanding national issues).
The term revolution generally means a process of radical change that destroys existing political, economic, ideological, social and cultural referential systems, replacing them with new visions and new patterns.
The central meaning of the revolution, in Karl Marx, is: the destruction of the old established society and the overthrow of the bourgeoisie and the liberation of the proletariat.
Political sociologists do not combine what the definition of revolution is, because there are no absolute judgments in the field of social sciences, but they meet at key points that can constitute a collective definition of the revolution. These points are: a sudden, rapid, profound change in the social entity, Continuation of the current situation in society.
Professor Harry Eckstein defined the revolution in his introduction to the internal war as "attempts to change with violence or the threat of using it against policies in power, against rulers, or against an organization." The sociologist Herbert Plummer describes the revolution as seeking to destroy, rebuild and reorganize the whole social order. Karl Mannheim believes that the revolution is consciously conscious, although some of the factors of this social work are unconscious. He therefore asserts that the revolution means what it means to expect a crash in the existing social entity and in the existing social organization. In short, the revolution is the reactions of individuals and groups to the current unsatisfactory conditions in their social life in general, to be organized in the collective behavior processes.
"The radical changes in the institutional structures of the society, those changes that transform the society outwardly and fundamentally from a pattern to a new pattern that conforms to the principles, values, ideology and objectives of the revolution, the revolution may be bloody, As it may be peaceful, and be abruptly fast or gradual slow.
Crane Brenton defines the revolution in his book "Dissection of the Revolution" by saying: "It is a dynamic process
Characterized by the transition from social structure to social structure. "Harry Eckstein," in his introduction to the internal war, defined it as "attempts to change with violence or the threat of using it against policies in power, against rulers, or against an organization." In the view of Peter Aman, the revolution is "a temporary or long-term refraction of the state's monopoly of power, accompanied by low obedience." Yuri Krazin sees Marxist literature in the analysis of social development. "The meaning and function of the social revolution can only be understood when we look at history Society as a continuum of socio-economic formations. The revolution is a form of transition from one form to another, and it is a leap from an economic and social formation to a more advanced formation whose characteristic characteristic and political content is the transfer of power to the revolutionary classes. Lori Krazan, aware of the revolution in Marxist theory, (translated by Samir Karam), Beirut: Dar Vanguard). Revolution is a historical development tool for human societies. It is a dividing line between the old and the new system, which radically changes the political, social, economic and even cultural structure. This change is aimed at creating a system that embodies the demands of the revolutionaries. The term is used to express radical changes in non-political fields such as science, art and culture because revolution means change. The concept of revolution was used in the political sense in the late Middle Ages, and political sociology is used to refer to the mutual effects of radical and sudden changes to social and political conditions. Characteristics of the concept of revolution: Most revolutions almost meet on a number of characteristics Revolutionary work distinguished itself from others.The revolution represents a larger sector of society against a smaller group that is dominated by political and economic power.The revolution is based on radical solutions and rejects reform solutions because it is fundamentally a radical change based on radical demands.The change caused by the revolution is fast and sudden, and rapid spreading between sectors massesThe change of revolution also includes a pattern of values and beliefs in line with the new stage.The revolution represents a process of social and political change.The revolution is based on new foundations and is contrary to the old system of laying the foundation for new building on new rules. The revolution is a repetitive and rapid transition between societies and across nations. Two basic types of revolutions: The first type does not lead to any direct political and social changes, but accumulates the possibility of community transition From socioeconomic and political structure to another structure, where change involves part of society or a field of knowledge, such as the scientific revolution The cultural revolution, the industrial revolution that emerged in the eighteenth century, which carried with it the second type factors leads to a radical change in the overall political and economic structure of society, It fundamentally changes the old system and replaces it with a new one with new institutions. This revolutionary pattern is described as a qualitative leap forward for society from one stage to the next. The revolution is a popular and spontaneous movement to change the situation in societies, which in turn is divided into three categoriesSo we see It becomes a conceptual confusion and intellectual confusion The term revolutionized the uprisings that failed to bring about a real change in the structure of the social society and the political structure and in the methods of its development, even if it succeeded in overthrowing the previous regimes and changing the ruling leadership.
Source: Urbanized Dialogue
* Abdel Ghaffar Mohamed Said - a journalist and a Sudanese researcher
Comments
Post a Comment