Blog is interested in strategic thinking and planning for peace and the dissemination of a culture of coexistence and cultural knowledge and news review. The Code is concerned with the various fields of reporting, cultural support and communication in the field of systematic analysis
Edited by Hatem Babeker Awad Al-Karim and others
Search This Blog
China breaks official silence on Cultural Revolution’s ‘decade of calamity
China’s Communist party-controlled press has broken its silence on
the 50th anniversary of Chairman Mao’s Cultural Revolution, urging
readers to consign the decade of turmoil to the history books and
claiming it gifted the country a “certain immunity” from civil unrest.
Beijing almost completely ignored Monday’s anniversary, fearing that any discussion of the party’s responsibility for those disastrous years might undermine its grip on power.
No official memorial events were held to remember a period during which up to 2 million lives are thought to have been lost as Red Guards ran riot and the army battled to restore order.
However, on Tuesday, two short editorials in the party-run press did
address the previous day’s anniversary. One, published on page four of
the party’s mouthpiece newspaper, The People’s Daily, urged citizens to
move on from the decade of upheaval, which officially began on 16 May
1966 and ended with Mao’s death in September 1976. The editorial claimed party leaders had already given a “clear answer” with regards to Mao’s responsibility for the decade of chaos and said it was time to look to the future.
“History has shown that the Cultural Revolution was utterly wrong, in
both theory and practice,” argued the People’s Daily article, which was
headlined “Learning lessons from history in order to better move
forward”.
Advertisement
A second editorial,
published in the state-run Global Times tabloid, said: “The decade of
calamity caused severe damage, leaving permanent pain for many Chinese.
Completely denying the values of the Cultural Revolution is not only an
understanding throughout the party, but also a stable consensus of the
whole of Chinese society,” added the article, entitled “Society firmly
rejects Cultural Revolution”.
The Global Times also claimed Mao’s mass mobilisation – which was
designed to help the elderly dictator reassert power over his party but
plunged China into virtual civil war – had in fact bestowed a positive legacy on the country.
“Over the past few years, many developing countries have experienced
civil strife, but not China,” the party-run newspaper claimed. “A
significant reason is that the lessons the Cultural Revolution taught us
has given the nation a certain immunity. Nobody fears turmoil and
desires stability more than us.”
Qiao Mu, an outspoken journalism professor from Beijing’s Foreign
Studies University, said the Communist party’s decision not to address
the anniversary until 24 hours after it had passed underlined its
discomfort.
“China had to show its stance but it was worried that if it published
something on the exact day it would trigger so-called social disorder
or encourage people to reassess the reasons and political basis for the
Cultural Revolution,” he said.
While the two editorials punctured the official silence surrounding
Monday’s anniversary, they offered no hint that the Communist party was
changing its stance on Mao’s calamitous final decade in power.
Both articles parroted a 1981 Communist party resolution
that conceded the Cultural Revolution had caused “domestic turmoil and
brought catastrophe to the party, the state and the whole people” but
skirted over Mao’s central role.
On Tuesday, the People’s Daily editorial made it clear that official
verdict would not be reassessed, describing it as “unshakeably
scientific and authoritative”. The newspaper said Chinese citizens now
needed to look to the future, throw their support behind President Xi
Jinping and “unswervingly take the road of socialism with Chinese
characteristics”.
The Global Times said the 1981 evaluation represented “the authoritative conclusion of the utter denial of Cultural Revolution”.
“We have bid farewell to the Cultural Revolution,” it added. “We can
say it once again today that the Cultural Revolution cannot and will not
come back. There is no place for it in today’s China.”
In a comment left beneath an online version of the Global Times’
editorial, one reader expressed scepticism that Beijing, which continues
to stifle academic research into the Cultural Revolution, might allow
its citizens to learn from the country’s history.
“As most information on this half-century-old historic tragedy still
remains largely limited and censored, how could present-day Chinese
people sincerely learn serious lessons from it?” Additional reporting by Christy Yao
Comments
Post a Comment