Iran in the examination of the requirements of the system and the liabilities of the people ------ Hatem Babeker Awad Al-Karim

Iran in the examination of the requirements of the system and the liabilities of the people ------ Hatem Babeker Awad Al-Karim
 For the first time, the ruling regime in Iran is subjected to a serious test that sees its existence as a political system that followed the Iranian people's revolution on a monarchy - the Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi - is the revolution repeated against the shah's successors? The Iranian revolution started on the American system allied with the United States. The revolution in which all popular groups participated and the left played a pivotal role. It started in October 1977. In 1978, it took the form of large-scale civil resistance, demonstrations and strikes and under public pressure, the Shah left Iran on 19 January 1979. Since the left (Toda and the creation) is incapable of achieving guarantees of national capitalism and unable to provide a balanced democratic program, the Shah's regime fell into the hands of the right-wing forces, which doubled their ability to return to Ayatollah Khomeini on the first of February 1979. The Shah collapsed in 11 days of Khomeini's return, Mohamed Reza Pahlavi Exit. The revolution at its inception was led by the Liberal and Left Alliance from October 1977 until January 1979, and the revolution was unable to open the horizons of tensions to an acceptable transformation of the world, giving religious groups the opportunity to kidnap the event and use it to produce the Islamic Republic of Iran.
What is more like today to yesterday:
 The popular revolution that is sweeping the Iranian street today is not fundamentally different from the revolution on the Shah regime in 1979. The common denominator is the waste of the resources and wealth of the state rich in oil and natural gas in aspects that do not relate to the interests of the Iranian people. The Shah and his ruling party have used the wealth for their benefit and bought the allegiance of the American and European West. The Islamic Revolution system has activated all religious trends. It basically awakened Shiites in the Middle East. In response to this, the Salafist Salafist movement developed and the international organization of the Brotherhood expanded. Iranian Iran-Iraq, which won them the ruling power in Tehran claimed that the replacement of the Iranian army army ideological conception of the world that Iran's human re-center the guidance of the Lord. Iran's ambitions to achieve the ambitions of its ruling class have used austerity policy and this is what the current leadership is doing. The Shah did not understand the Iranian political movement and ignored it, and now the Iranian leadership believes that it is still in the stage of revolution that left the apartment and emerged as a bright change and renewal did not absorb its reference to the truth in the Iranian political system itself, where the stream of renewal faced by the traditional ruling institution repression and intimidation, not to mention outside the system. The Iranian regime derives its vitality from its battle with the West and with the Sunni Muslim world. The Iranian regime did not understand that the people were no longer able to tolerate the gruesome wars of the people, the erosion of their resources and wealth and the control of eternal poverty because of the aspirations of the imperial rulers.
 Reform or revolution
 The Iranian authorities may be able to liquidate the street protests in days, weeks or even months, but they can not suppress the popular desire for change if we take into consideration the economic transformation that has emerged on the clerics who have become the same class of the shah that demands the people for austerity. The social contrast that generated the protests is so profound that it will remain an existential threat to the regime, its ideology and ideology, especially since many international developments are blocking the ambitions of the imperial ruling power. The stubborn facts put the regime either as two choices over the ruling class
* Self-transformation and openness and openness to national forces, democracy, liberalism and leftist - out of order and out of the theocratic form of the state. This trend was initiated by Tehran with hesitation, hesitation and limited scope within the regime. This needs to improve economic conditions.
* If the Islamic Republic is unable to move from the corner of the revolution and move to the demands of states and designed the conservative trend to complete the nuclear battles in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Yemen and wasted money in the polarization of dreams of the revolution in the Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula, it is certain that the conditions of the people will deteriorate and will not be unavoidable Revolution if it is not today tomorrow
The free world has to support the Iranian people in both directions, enriching the Iranian regime for integration into the international community, making serious reforms in the files of freedoms, human rights, democracy and laying the values ​​of peace in the Gulf. At the same time supporting the Iranian people in the path of democracy and decent living by facilitating the overthrow of the oppressive regime
                                                               Omdurman
                                                                                   Hatem Babeker Awad Al - Karim