🍁 A message to the Independent National Autonomous Party
Introduction.
Before clarifying the basis of our dialogue with you on the political thesis we received from Professor Malik Hussein, head of the party, we should highlight our perception of the current political situation in Sudan.
?What should we do
Hatem Babeker Awad Al - Karim
(1)
.The roots of the political movement and its impact on its political behavior
The Sudanese political movement emerged in Arbabanat the twentieth century with the development of the Sudanese state and the emergence of new social groups contacted modernity of the educated, businessmen, farmers, manufacturers, patrons and armed forces. It is true that the historical circumstances that the Sudanese political movement was born among school graduates that began in 1899 Following the collapse of the state of Mahdia (1885-1899). The right is said to have left the image of the Sudanese nation and the Sudanese personality through complex political battles and compounded to indicate the emerging national interests in the face of foreign interests in conflict with it There were several stations, including the revolution of 1924 The association between Egypt and the position of the English and then turned to the national aspirations of the national organization was literary associations, cultural and intellectual, which formed the foundation of the alumni conference of 1938. Political parties born in the embrace of the alumni conference, which had its deep problems of origin and awareness of national interests and diversity and diversity and the ability to express The total number of people and its constituent, ethnic, regional and cultural components. The Sudanese political movement led by its federal and independent parties, the position of the colonial existence was independence from within the parliament and the evacuation on 1/1/1956.
(2)
The performance of the political movement after independence (1956-1964)
After independence, the Sudanese political movement did not complete a permanent constitution and a document of national interests. The strategy of establishment for development and development. This is why the Sudanese human life has not changed because of the absence of a program based on a clear strategic plan that can be applied to defend national interests. Was a rival to the Sudanese state and the Sudanese nation and the crystallization of the Sudanese personality for this income Sudan in the case of political instability and the prevalence of the system of government between the military and civilians of the dominant groups. For the same reasons paved the way for the war of identities in C And the Sudan, which erupted in 1955 following protests demanding the procedures of secession and mistrust of the educated class heading to become a class dominated by ethno-religious, and with the length of armed conflict and the presence of the interests of the regional neighborhood of Sudan here and here and the profound international influences the conflict in the south has become a clash of ideological ethno-religious ethnic erosion of The cohesion of the Sudanese state and the project of unity of the Sudanese nation and destroy the crystallization of the Sudanese personality. Where the Sudanese parties in the north after October 1964 that the main reason for the delay of the Sudan is the failure to apply the Sharia and the Arab Muslim affiliation, so the slogan of Islamic dossier rose. The split between the population components and the dominant categories, which held the political scene in general and the South in particular, In the 1960s, where the independent and federal parties were transformed simply to express the interests of influential religious political families - the Mehrgani and Mahdi - and the decline of the role of the other social groups of the rear seat and the interests of the dominant groups became more important than interests National. This transformation was reflected in the definition of the war of the south from a war of social injustice to a war of identities and aspirations with national aspirations. What reflected the retreat on Sudanese nationalism and the Sudanese personality and the re-crystallization of the state on the basis of the Arab Muslim ignoring the Sudanese nation project and the Sudanese personality and accelerate the dismantling of the Sudanese state in favor of a state Imaginary Imagination.
The general public awareness did not conform to the perceptions of the political movement. The popular aspiration was based on highlighting the Sudanese self and the peaceful solution of the southern war and keeping pace with the global advancement of the newly independent states. Therefore, the Sudanese people met the May 1969 coup with a great welcome from the cities. During the Addis Ababa Agreement of 1972, which approved the regional autonomy of the south, which became the general framework of government for the whole of Sudan and circulated to the rest of the regions.
(3)
The Second Civil War (1983-2005)
The international regional circumstances of the 1980s led to a series of good deeds in the Arab and Islamic region to face the challenges of producing wealth and oil and the deep entry into the global market. Necessarily pushed the system of May to reconcile with the traditional political forces on 7/7/1977, which had its political agenda different from the experience of May in the foundations of building a modern state based on stimulating and moving the national will and respect for agreements with the regions, especially that the agreement with the south has been circulated and became the regional rule And local government rules of the political system, ie the satisfaction of the great blackness. In reconciling with the traditional forces gave them the advantages of making them move to restructure the countries with a religious perspective and to make substantive changes to ensure their interests so the slogans of the sixties sent the rest of the events of structural and structural changes in the state and The changes that aspire to the title of the Shariah, which is achieved by the emotional circumstance around it is the application of Islamic law, which was taken in May in implementation in September 1983 where the problem of reconciliation environment incubating a different system in its orientations and perceptions of the existing and may help changes Regional and international to complete the task and re-aligning to accelerate the structural and structural changes sought by the traditional forces, which created the injustice of the participation groups in the state and the system of government. Through the decisions of the People's Assembly and the presidential decrees, the 1973 Constitution was abrogated and the Addis Ababa Agreement was delegated, creating objective motives
And self-return to the box of civil war with new slogans and a new political speech in May 1983 and the introduction of Sudan in the case of instability and arbitrary formal stability. Here we have to separate the fundamental causes of the second civil war in the south, and we do not want to be prepared to change the internal situation as a result of reconciliation and change of the Arab and African lives, but we will explain the reasons for the war as stated in the literature of the fighting parties:
- Regional injustice and unbalanced development
- The unequal sharing of power and wealth between the central government and the region
- African-African identity contrasts with Arab-Islamic identity.
The second civil war took place between 1983 and 2005. Resources and the existence of the state were destroyed and the limited capabilities were limited. They opened the way for fighting the tribal and ethnic population and halted investment in oil initiated by the American Petroleum Company (Chevron) and found the arguments of division and schism and rupture a path of political literature. The Muslim trend claims that the deficit and underdevelopment are caused by the secular minority's control over the Muslim majority. The South Sudan Patriotic Movement also claimed the origin of the Sudanese problem in the control of the Arab Muslim minority over the African majority and the imposition of culture and belonging. This is why the Southern Movement has raised the slogan of a new Sudan that ends the rule of the unjust minority of the majority. The groups of the Islamic trend also raised the slogan of cleansing the state of secularism, which does not control what Allah has revealed. The two directions dominated the decision-making process, thus creating a confrontation that brought the Sudanese people into civil war. The social fabric was dismantled, development was destroyed, and the unity projects were halted and established to lead to division, thus creating conditions that accommodate their aspirations for structural and structural changes and abolishing the state.
(4)
After the Intifada - Third Democracy. (1986-1989)
The economic crisis, drought, desertification, famine and the eruption of the southern war formed reasons for the revolution and the anger of the masses that was invested to re-formulate the political state system in favor of the new forces. In April 1985, the popular and military events strengthened the status of the Islamic movement, which dominated the third democracy in most of the seats of the Constituent Assembly - the Alliance, the Union and the Front.
- Economic reform
- Cease civil war in the south
- Permanent Constitution
- Rehabilitation of civil and military service.
After the third democratic uprising, the civil war escalated and the tribes were armed here and there, as the military confrontation in the south appeared to be a confrontation between the components of the population on the basis of race, color and religion. Since the road of confrontation here and there was an interest in structural and structural changes in the national structure and the state, To prolong the war, they rejected the peace efforts. This was the coup of June 30, 1989, the division of the armed movement in the central south, Turtit and the Nasserites, and the transformation of its first charter towards self-determination, in which the spirit of division was consolidated, especially after the approval of the political movement in the north These events have caused structural and field changes in the form and content of the civil war and the establishment of the ground for the independence of southern Sudan, which was formulated in the 2005 Nevada Agreement between the choices of unity and separation through the general referendum which was implemented. The independence of the south. Yes, the sharing of brotherhood enemies interests from the legacy of the old Sudan, which was assassinated with subtlety and subtlety. The Sudanese state failed here and there and assassinated the Sudanese nation project and stopped the development of the Sudanese personality. The rule was based on the generalization of the right to self-determination and independence. Regional rule was also promulgated after the Addis Ababa Convention of 1972, which approved regional autonomy and repeated the model to all the directorates of the Sudan as distorted in the imbalanced federal government that is the rule of government in the north.
(5)
The birth of a new political party
We must admit that there is an old specter in Sudan - the specter of vanishing, disintegration and division into smaller mosaic units, perhaps before the total collapse of the country, which has been characterized by self-destructiveness and self-destruction since the 1980s. All internal, For the dismantling of the Sudan, which was carried out in slow and slow steps. The so-called Comprehensive Peace Agreement 2005 became known as the Neighboring Neighboring Countries (IGAD) and the platform for generalizing the demands of the right of self-determination which led to the independence of Southern Sudan in 2011 and will lead Sudan's regions to the same fate. This situation has brought back scenes of the old war of attrition in the south now being reintroduced in Darfur, the Nuba Mountains, the Blue Nile and perhaps in eastern Sudan, which means the same result that has reached southern Sudan. In Sudan and the international blessing that Sudan inherited the deficit to facilitate its blackmail and division.
The parties of the political movement went bankrupt when they were surprised that their political behavior and political demands led to a result that they did not consider, and they exchanged accusations between the opponents and those who hold power over the separation of the south from who pushed southern Sudan to independence from Sudan, through its positions and behavior? Any party trying to paste the charge in others, the fact that the dismantling of the division has objective reasons and political positions of self created by all components of the traditional political movement left and right.
It is possible to draw two things:
The first is the retreat of the support of the completion of the maturity of the Sudanese nation, whose entrance was the assassination of the Sudanese personality and the obstruction of the Sudanese nation's growth. The struggle movement and the national stressed the inability of the traditional political movement to secure the public interests and directions on virtual imaginary issues related to confronting conflicting identities that consumed resources and energies and destroyed the conditions of national unity. National. This national betrayal involved all the forces of the political movement in one way or another when:
- Failed to write a permanent constitution
- Failed to write a document of national strategic interests.
- Failed to build a stable, popularly supported government that addresses the world as a positive reactor in building international peace and security.
Therefore, it is not appropriate to be part of the solution, which means the need for new political forces
Second: National interests remain a strategic perspective in contradiction with the perceptions of the political movement, which is drawn to collusion with the international and regional against the interest and patriotism to achieve the self-interests of the politically-dominated ruling class, the politically bankrupt whose leaders assert their ugly political behavior and the clogged horizon.
The director is the birth of a party that deals with the national interests away from the ideological and ideological quagmire that has brought the nation into the fold of a national national trend that reflects the great blackness of the people. This party is able to be automatically formed by the support of other forces that believe in the national determinants and the popular strategy of national unity and the Sudanese nationalism. This party will live only by supporting other forces to form a new national national movement independent of the historical decision-making centers and the experience of the sterile old Sudanese political movement Following the closure of its horizons and adoption of initiatives from the regional and international environment, lack of initiative and principles.
Omdurman
Hatem Babeker Awad Al - Karim
Comments
Post a Comment