Who will win the war, democratic values or thermal powers?
Hatem Babiker instead of Karim
I am frustrated by the superficial reading of the balance of power between Europe and Russia. The ability to destroy the world many times over, but has had a hard time on Russian soil since Tsarism. The Soviets, until Putin’s era, began to believe in peaceful deliberation, democratic transition, and democratic peace. The process was confined to Putin and the prime minister who holds the position of national security official. He repressed, since 2000, asserting that Russia is based on absolute autocracy, seeks to spread dictatorship, opposes democratic human values, and will not stand until his teeth. .
The absolute rule of the individual in Germany (Hitler) established the most powerful armies in history and invaded Europe east and west, but it is not due to a lack of artillery fire and tools of destruction, the built values, and the primitiveness of the system that has no weight for man and his rights, in the absence of legitimacy, the atrophy of moral values, and the casting of the role and peoples, Russia that aspires not to The habit of organizing the public on fair grounds, did it establish justice in Russia? Does its system really reflect the will of the peoples of Russia? In the past, it was said that the one who lost something does not give it, so the forces of unilateralism and dictatorship (China) and Russia, association, justice, and justice in freedoms, rights and rights, the opposite is true. No matter how much we count the mistakes, crimes and transgressions of the West in all fields, the reality remains that the West’s regimes are not ruled by the absolute individual (the just tyrant). States are once again subject to assessment, rectification and accountability. The people’s actions are an authority of rationality and realism, and they exercise freedom of choice, no matter how the centers of power and decision intervene. Regimes express will beyond The absolute individual.
The countdown to February 2023 reminds of the Russian invasion of a country and the expansionist Russian desire for the Russian leadership that suffers from internal crises and the erosion of the regime’s legitimacy by referring to the record of the record of suppressing opponents and copying human rights. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is motivated by turning a blind eye to the internal crisis. The national war and the Russian Russia. The problem of the Russian regime is not Washington, London, or Berlin, or how Russia played Russia in Washington or defeated it. In the year 1991, all the masks of the Soviets fell, and it became their state, and the winds of popular polemics and revolutions that started the Solidarity Union in Poland in The port of Gdansk, then after that, constitute the idea of a system of backwardness and hunger.
Comments
Post a Comment