alfajr aljadid الفجر الجديد

 The idea of dissolving the army is an accumulated stock in Sudanese partisan political thought.    Dr.. Hatem Babiker Awad Al- Karim Malell The dialogue on the framework agreement as a basis for the transition between the forces of the uprising (2018-2019) made the issue of building a unified, professional army the basis for the future Sudanese state. The task has economic and intellectual dimensions and the future of building the state. The fundamental problem is in the concept adopted by the political forces for this treatment imposed by the political framework. The Sudanese army has been laying the basis for bargaining and dialogue about the homeland since the outbreak of the national movement in southern Sudan in Torit August 1955 AD, and thus it is the main actor. In building the Sudanese state throughout the era of independence, the partisan political thought is inherently abiding by the relationship with the Sudanese army. In 1976 AD, the forces of the National Front entered Kh

 Crises of the post-rescue state and the problem of political thought to build the state. (1). The incident of the military deployment in Meroe Hatem Babiker Awad Al- Karim. # The uprising (2018-2019 AD) produced new strategic military-political weights in the Sudanese scene that cannot be bypassed without joint action to build the state. The internal affairs and the regional and international systems - the issue of the single national army is inseparable from the issue of building the Sudanese state that expresses all the Sudanese, and it is not a secondary issue that is solved by political tactics, as happened on the eve of independence by pledging to the parliamentary bloc of the south in federalism in exchange for voting in the Constituent Assembly for independence, and on this agreement was the declaration of independence from within Parliament on December 18, 1955 AD, and after that the parties retracted the agreement, and the function of the army was shifted to maintaining inter

 "Sorry...we have an army..." Far from the political chants.   Written by / Hatem Babiker Awad Al-Karim. # The Sudanese army has its history and doctrine and will not become the People’s Liberation Army, so it will remain the same army that was founded in 1925 AD after the withdrawal of the Egyptian battalions and the dismantling of the battalions that came after the foreign invasion that crushed the first Sudanese army in the Battle of Karari September 1898 AD based on the Second Rule Agreement in January 1899 M. # The Sudanese army has a long history in the manufacture, integration and formation of “al-defense” reserve armies since the second European war (1939-1945 AD), Anana, the Marahil and the Border Guard. It has internal security and emergency tasks according to the constitutional document (the bilateral rule agreement) on which the states in Sudan were established and inherited by the successive governments of Sudan. The Sudanese city was associated with the establis

 Saudi Arabia sticks to Arab Initiative in drive for ties with Israel aletho Mar 16 MEMO | March 16, 2023 Saudi Arabia's former intelligence chief has said that the Kingdom is sticking to the terms of the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative in its drive to normalise relations with Israel. "The terms are well-known," Prince Turki Al-Faisal told France 24. "The creation of a sovereign Palestinian state with recognised borders and Jerusalem is its capital, and the return of Palestine refugees." He pointed out that these were the conditions that Saudi Arabia added to the initiative before it was adopted by the Arab League 21 years ago. The Arab Peace Initiative has been rejected by every Israeli government since then. Moreover, several Arab states have bypassed it and forged ties with the occupation state. Replying to a question about the potential normalisation of ties with Israel without fulfilling these conditions, Al-Faisal confirmed: "What I have said was not my op

 Did US raise a false flag on Nord Stream blasts? aletho Mar 9 BY BRADLEY K. MARTIN | ASIA TIMES | MARCH 9, 2023 Investigative reporter Seymour Hersh said an odd thing on March 7 when TASS asked him to compare his version of the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipeline explosions (US Navy divers did it, he had reported February 8) with a newly released version from the New York Times and German media that points to non-governmental Ukrainians as culprits. “I don’t want to get into it,” Hersh replied to the Russian wire service. “You should decide for yourself. It’s up to you.” The TASS reporter persisted, asking if Hersh thought the New York Times account had come in response to Hersh’s own investigation. He gave the same reply, saying people should come to their own conclusions. That was pretty clever. Read both versions and you may conclude that they could fit together to point to a plausible account of how, as war raged over Ukraine, three pipelines supplying Germany’s gas supply from Russia we

 The war of initiatives and companies is sweeping Asia Professor / Salah El-Din Abdel-Rahman Al-Douma.   Arab Journal Academic Scientific Paper حرب المبادرات تجتاح اسيا  بروفسير  صلاح الدين عبد الرحمن الدومة. ورقة علمية اكاديمية منشورة في المجلة العربية.