Rapid changes in the global system and changing the strategies of the major Powers Hatem Babeker Awad Al - Karim

Rapid changes in the global system and changing the strategies of the major Powers
Hatem Babeker Awad Al - Karim
Here we are trying to analyze the international variables and their impact on the US cancellation of its commitment to the nuclear agreement with Iran.
 A profound difference is the deep coordination between Moscow and Washington after the events of September 11, 2001, and the result of the American war in Afghanistan and Iraq during the period from 2001 to 2003, which allowed the Russian role to grow, as did the Arab Spring, a deeper reflection of the Russian intervention in Syria. It is true that Russia does not move its strategy by the historical ideological advance known to the Soviet Union. However, Russia's pragmatic approach makes it an international player that is more influential on the international order, leading to changes in the strategies of China, the European Union and the United States.
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Tuesday announced US strategy toward Iran. This strategy comes under three major change points in international politics
- The failure of the European security system after the Cold War in 1991, based on the siege of Russia through the expansion of NATO
- Russian expansion in the Middle East, ie the occupation of the central foot point in the Mediterranean - Tartous and Hmimim air - and this advantage was not possible for the former Soviet Union. Russia's first strategic issue transcended the Soviet role in the international system and the breach of the European blockade represented in the qualitative expansion of NATO in the Balkans and in Eastern Europe and the employment of Ukraine as a bully and a siege of Russia.
- The erosion of republics - republican regimes - in the Middle East, especially Egypt, Syria and Iraq ... Iran's work in the context of radical changes in the Gulf and Saudi Arabia and America seeks to preserve the kingdoms vital scope.
- The choice of the United Nations The path of dialogue with North Korea as an alternative to the old siege policy, which means a shift in the strategy of the United States in Southeast Asia and it will undoubtedly affect the nuclear situation with Iran. The dialogue with Korea is complemented by the nuclear agreement with Iran because it is the base on which the level of armaments and central points Another minute.
- The establishment of the deal for the era of peace in the Middle East and here comes the importance of restraining and taming the forces against the deal
 From here, we say that the US strategy toward Iran is not aimed at changing the regime of Tehran, but rather at changing the international order in favor of the American role
- A reference to Washington's willingness to break the historical link between the two sides of the Atlantic in the framework of new alliances with Russia and China in exchange for preferential advantages and disengagement with Tehran and Boyang in exchange for new employment of the role of Israel in the joint strategy of the international parties.